Safaricom PLC, Kenya’s leading telecommunications company, is facing serious allegations of fraud, bid-rigging, and unethical business practices. Reports indicate that internal corruption within the company has compromised its operations, leading to concerns over governance, transparency, and political interference.
A recent investigative report by Kagirison Research has shed light on irregularities within Safaricom’s supply chain. The report, titled “Ndegwa, Rigathi, and Fraud in Safaricom Group,” details how a politicized workplace environment and questionable procurement practices have allegedly benefited associates linked to Deputy President Rigathi Gachagua. The findings suggest that certain influential individuals have gained an unfair advantage in securing lucrative contracts, raising red flags about the integrity of Safaricom’s business operations.
At the center of the controversy is Oxygène Marketing Communications Limited (Oxygène MCL) and The Star Kenya, both of which have been mentioned in connection with attempts to influence the public narrative surrounding these allegations. According to Kagirison Research, shortly after publishing their report, they were contacted by individuals believed to be affiliated with Oxygène MCL and The Star Kenya. These individuals allegedly sought to discredit the findings or downplay the severity of the accusations against Safaricom.
The nature of these interactions has sparked speculation about a coordinated effort to manage the company’s public image rather than addressing the core issues of corruption and malpractice. If true, such actions would further damage Safaricom’s credibility, as they suggest a deliberate attempt to suppress transparency instead of taking corrective action.
The allegations go beyond mere corporate misconduct. If high-ranking government officials or their associates are indeed influencing Safaricom’s procurement processes, it raises serious concerns about the fairness of competition in Kenya’s business environment. Companies without political ties may find it difficult to compete for contracts, resulting in a market skewed in favor of those with connections to powerful figures.
For years, Safaricom has positioned itself as a leader in technological innovation and corporate responsibility. It has built a strong reputation both locally and internationally, but these recent claims threaten to undermine its credibility. Stakeholders, including investors, business partners, and customers, will be watching closely to see how the company responds to these allegations.
The Ethics and Anti-Corruption Commission (EACC) and other relevant authorities may be compelled to launch investigations into the matter. If the claims of fraud and bid-rigging are proven, the consequences could be severe, including legal action against those involved, possible contract cancellations, and reputational damage that could affect Safaricom’s business operations.
At a time when public trust in corporate institutions is declining, transparency and accountability are more crucial than ever. If Safaricom is to maintain its position as Kenya’s leading telecom company, it must address these concerns head-on rather than attempting to control the narrative through media influence.
The coming weeks and months will be critical in determining the outcome of this controversy. Will Safaricom come clean and commit to genuine reforms, or will it allow political interests to continue shaping its business operations? The answers to these questions will not only impact Safaricom but could also set a precedent for corporate ethics and governance in Kenya.